ciekawe co piją dzisiaj w BETDAQ
żołądkową. na niestrawność.
a mówiąc serio, proponuję przeczytac poniższy uwagi napisane przez jednego gracza.
But so long as your commission paid over the last 60 weeks is at least 20% of your profit over the last 60 weeks, you won't qualify for the premium charge (at least, that's how I read it).
If you're not trading and making a profit on most markets you trade in, I think it's going to be quite hard to qualify for this charge. For example, if you're making bets at odds of around 2.00 and commission is paid on your bets (by you if you win, by somebody else if you lose) at an average of 3%, then according to my calculations you'd need a strike rate of 57.5%, which is a pre-commission yield of +15%, over 60 weeks in order that your commission didn't already cover it.
(...) I think people are generally overstating the effect it would have. In particular, when freddytherib says that it means that a quoted price of 2.00 effectively means that somebody paying the premium charge is only getting 4/5, that's just wrong. Yes, if you bet £100, you only make a net profit of £80 if you win, because of the 20% "tax" on your winnings. But he's forgetting that if you lose, then that reduces your "pre-tax" profit by £100, so you pay £20 less in premium charge. So you're actually risking £80 to win £80. So in fact you're effectively placing that bet commission-free. That's a silver lining for traders who make enough to pay the premium charge, though not enough to make up for the extra tax on their trading profits.